<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwiz.co.uk/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>Roger's Access Library : Understanding many-to-many from a different angle</title>
  <link>www.rogersaccesslibrary.com/forum/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; Roger's Access Library : Schapel, Steve  : Understanding many-to-many from a different angle]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 12:30:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 10.15</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.rogersaccesslibrary.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=479</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Understanding many-to-many from a different angle : Many-to-many relationships  In...]]></title>
   <link>www.rogersaccesslibrary.com/forum/understanding-manytomany-from-a-different-angle_topic479_post486.html#486</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="www.rogersaccesslibrary.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=51">Steve Schapel</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 479<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 04&nbsp;Jul&nbsp;2009 at 12:30pm<br /><br /><P style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 171pt" ="Ms&#111;normal"><B><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" lang=EN-NZ>Many-to-many relationships<?: prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><O:P></O:P></SPAN></B></P><P style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 171pt" ="Ms&#111;normal"><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold" lang=EN-NZ><O:P></O:P></SPAN></P><P style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 171pt" ="Ms&#111;normal"><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold" lang=EN-NZ>In real-life situations, elements of information are often in a many-to-many relationship with each other.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>An Employee can work on a number of Projects, and a Project can be worked on by a number of Employees.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>A Member can borrow a number of Books from a library, and a Book can be borrowed by a number of Members.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>A Student can enrol in a number of Courses, and a Course can have a number of Students enrolled.<O:P></O:P></SPAN></P><P style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 171pt" ="Ms&#111;normal"><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold" lang=EN-NZ><O:P></O:P></SPAN></P><P style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 171pt" ="Ms&#111;normal"><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold" lang=EN-NZ>However, when trying to model this information into a relational database structure, Access doesn't allow us to directly establish a many-to-many relationship between 2 Tables...</P><DIV></DIV><P style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 171pt" ="Ms&#111;normal">Read more here: <a href="http://accesstips.datamanagementsoluti&#111;ns.biz/many.htm" target="_blank"><strong><U>http://accesstips.datamanagementsolutions.biz/many.htm</U></strong></A></SPAN></P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 12:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">www.rogersaccesslibrary.com/forum/understanding-manytomany-from-a-different-angle_topic479_post486.html#486</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>